Roland Garros: a Land of Mystery
by Manish Kumar Joshi
The red-baked clay at Roland Garros has authored innumerable stories. Stories of artistry dwindled away into fodder for grinders,
stories of greatness denied by the most demanding of surfaces and stories of men and women succeeding on the only Grand Slam stage
that would pamper their skills
From the days of Susan Lenglen sipping brandy between sets to Rafael Nadal's colourful bottled concoctions, a lot has changed at
the French Open. But some things remain the same. There is intrigue and frustration in Roland Garros for some, as much as there is
comfort for a few others. For the man who conquers everything else, the French Open is a roadblock and a puzzle. It is a nitpicking
surface that bloats his weaknesses. As far as he can see it, it demands loads of patience and different set of skills.
But for those born to the surface, Roland Garros is all they've got. Ball-pushers, retrievers, top-spinners, scramblers,
ubiquitous European and South American grinders and owners of any clay-court parlance — they all converge on their Grand
Slam prey. But despite that, the French Open still harbours fantasies. The artist still hopes to win. Those on the brink of
creating history still feel they can master the surface.
Each of the four Grand Slams has its own character. The Australian Open, the youngest of the four, prides itself as being
the `Happy Slam'. Flushing Meadows is busy, concrete and colourful during the US Open. Wimbledon with the pristine whites
and the grass is as much about history and tradition, as it's about the dynamics of grass-court tennis. Roland Garros is
not devoid of tradition or history, but its character and identity lie in what its courts, composed of clay, contain.
It is that toughness that has come to symbolise Roland Garros. Every Grand Slam has had its share of marathon encounters, but
clay has an elevated sense of drama and showcases a more apparent display of physical strength and stamina, unlike grass, which
calls for a more subtle show of strength.
"Because the surface is much slower and the ball bounces higher than on grass or hard courts, the rallies last much longer. It is
not unusual for one to last 10 to15 strokes, compared with two or three on grass. So you have to be a very strong athlete with
great stamina," former British Davis Cup captain Paul Hutchins told BBC. The rapidly slowing surfaces at Wimbledon might change
the dynamics in a few years time. Hutchins' words are not new for followers of the game, but it conveys the basics of clay-court
tennis, which is perhaps the most difficult adjustment to make for most. But the dirt is not merely physical exertion. If one
wishes to look beyond tiresome and long rallies, the `slidyness' of clay gives most the leeway for some deft footwork; something
that makes for good viewing.
The 2008 edition will once again showcase Federer and Nadal looking to defy and create history, in their own way. The Swiss will,
like a lot of his predecessors, search to master a surface most alien to him.
"Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Serena, Justine and Venus", said Serena when asked to name her favorites. Not too far off the mark, if you
could ignore Venus (with due respect to her). Of course, Justine Henin has since retired.
The women have their own past to live up to.
Ana Ivanovic, Jelena Jankovic, Maria Sharapova and Serena, all with sufficient skill and character to live up to the likes of Chris Evert,
Martina Navratilova and Steffi Graf, look most likely to have the bloody-mindedness to survive the grind. After the build-up events,
it's time now for the true test of clay court callisthenics.