by Ed Zafian
Hingis however needs not worry, her place in tennis history is
secure. My guess is that she just wants everyone to remember that she
is still a force despite the current media blitz touting the WTA as
the "Williams" Tennis Association. Hingis does have five Grand Slam
titles to date, and from 1997 through 1999 racked up an impressive
record. Hingis's 1997 is a one she will unlikely ever be able to
repeat, winning three Slams and reaching the final of the other (it is
hard to believe that only 3 years ago Iva Majoli downed Hingis at the
French). Despite her French Open meltdown in the final to Graf and her
no-show first round loss to Dokic at Wimbledon, 1999 was also
impressive with the Australian Open title and appearances in two other
Slams.
Much has been made recently of Hingis's lack of Grand Slam titles over
the past two years. This is certainly an irrefutable fact. After to
her near Grand Slam in 1997, Hingis has only captured two Australians
(1998 & 1999) -- 2 of the last 11 Slams. It is certainly worth
argument, that Hingis is the least dominant #1-ranked player in the
Open Era over the past two years. What Hingis has been is the most
consistent and injury-free player on the Tour. Deservedly so, those
two facts have kept Hingis at #1 for and why, in a very achievable more
25 weeks, she will usurp Monica Seles's #4 spot on the "all time total
weeks at #1" list.
Hingis's guile on the court is under attack by power players or what
Mary Carillo dubbed "Big Babe Tennis." Since Hingis's last Slam
(Australia in 1999), the next six Slams have been won by the hardest
hitting women (Graf, Davenport, Serena, Davenport again, Pierce, Venus)
on the Tour.
While Davenport and the Williams sisters have fewer Grand Slam titles
than Hingis, the potential to add to them has swung in favor of the
Hingis's nemeses. Davenport took control over Hingis earlier this year
and only a handful of injuries have kept her from regaining the #1
ranking (even as recently as the Canadian Open a couple of weeks ago).
The Williams sisters have similarly fallen victim to their own bodies
and were off the radar for a good part of this year. Unlike
Davenport, the Williams sisters lacked on-court consistency both in
their shots and mental strength to seriously be considered contenders
for the top two spots in the rankings. Serena's surprising US Open
title last year I believe had a negative effect on both sisters - Venus
being upended by her younger sister and Serena being hesitant to
overshadow her elder sister. I offer that Venus needed to win a Slam
before the two sisters, together, could begin their path to the
top rankings. Granted this is 'Monday morning quarterbacking," but
with the psychological barriers broken by Venus's Wimbledon title the
summer assault by the Williamses leading up to the US Open is not the
least bit surprising.
Hingis, Davenport, and the Williams sisters are a dangerous quartet.
We should be seeing those four names in the semifinals of the Slams
for the foreseeable future. Hingis's focus on her past accomplishments
is telling. On the verge of her three-year Slam streak ending at
Flushing Meadows, Hingis may be feeling her stranglehold on the Tour
coming to an end. Monica Seles recently hired a trainer to improve her
power and fitness. Seles confessed to her inability to keep up with
the top players. Despite a paltry 2-10 record versus Hingis, Seles
only cited Davenport and the Williams sisters as the "new generation."
Hopefully, Hingis will take a cue from Seles's statement. Not unlike
Seles herself, Hingis might be swept from the top spot by the
increasing power on the WTA Tour. Her opponents's delicate bodies are
the only hope for Hingis over the next year.
|