It was a perfect, sunny desert day in Indian Wells. The women's side of the tournament saw Venus and Serena
Williams set up a family semifinal duel with easy triumphs over disappointingly inept opposition, while the men's
tournament filled the grounds with spirited second-round matches
Women's quarterfinals
Serena Williams (7) def. Lindsay Davenport (2), 6-1, 6-2
Previous head-to-head: Williams leads 5-2
Venus Williams (3) def. Elena Dementieva (8), 6-0, 6-3
Previous head-to-head: Tied 1-1
Venus and Serena Williams set up an all-Williams semifinal this afternoon in back-to-back matches. The scores were impressive, but quite frankly, their opponents came up with poor, blundering performances.
Serena was by far the more convincing of the sisters, playing a clean and confident match (20 winners, 14 unforced errors) to reinforce her career domination over Lindsay after Davenport's straight-set win over Serena in the U.S. Open semifinal last year. Serena played a controlled, tidy match, and said after the match that limiting errors was the plan. "It gets to a point where you get tired of going for too much and making too many errors," admitted Serena. "I'm getting a little older, and I need to g
o ahead and straighten things out."
As for Davenport, amorphous and seemingly lost on the court (4 winners, 19 unforced errors), her post match self-criticism was harsh and completely justified. "I don't think I've felt that spastic on court in a number of years," lamented the world number two. I do believe that is the first time a player has ever used the word "spastic" in a press conference, but the self-criticism was justified.
If Davenport was "spastic", Dementieva was, well? let's let Elena describe it: "I never played so bad in my life." Again, I would not presume to disagree, in light of Dementieva's eye-popping 41 unforced errors compared to just 6 winners. Venus was not nearly as sharp as Serena had been, and continually gave Elena chances that the Russian was too inaccurate to seize.
So our semifinals, which will be played tomorrow, are:
- Martina Hingis (1) vs. Kim Clijsters (14)
- Venus Williams(3) vs. Serena Williams(7)
We hope for more drama and better tennis tomorrow than we got today. Clijsters has never beaten Hingis in three tries, but her most recent match, a 4-6 4-6 loss in Sydney this year, shows that she is getting closer to Martina's level. As for Venus and Serena, we devoutly hope they will better competition for each other than their opponents were for them today.
Sebastien Grosjean (16) def. Carlos Moya, 6-3, 4-6, 7-6 (7-3)
2nd round
Stadium 3
Previous head-to-head: Grosjean leads 2-1
The best match of the day on the men's side was this scintillating duel. Grosjean, who has always had great speed and an impressive, whipping forehand, has become a top-drawer player this year thanks to an improved serve and forehand. Moya, seeking to regain the form that brought him to number one briefly in 1999, is still capable of wonderful tennis but seems to be in a one step forward, one step back rut in his career. The fans who ventured out to Stadium 3 for this contest were treated to great cour
t coverage and variety from these two evenly-matched players.
Moya appeared to have shot himself in the foot in the third set, when he committed a couple of baseline errors at 4-4 to allow Grosjean to break, and serve for the match at 5-4. The 5'9" Frenchman took a 40-15 lead, giving himself two match points. But Grosjean nervously shanked a forehand wide on the first opportunity, and on the second match point, Moya jumped on a weak and shaky second serve to mash a forehand winner. Moya finally broke Grosjean's serve with a strong forehand approach shot that forc
ed a stretching Grosjean to drive his passing shot into the net. Moya was still alive at 5-5.
Then it was Moya's turn to hold match points, at 5-6 15-40 on Grosjean's serve. On the first match point, Moya pulled Grosjean wide, but missed the open court with a forehand. The Spaniard also wasted the second match point, sending a forehand beyond the baseline. Grosjean finally saved the game with one of his patented inside-out forehand winners. So, with each player having failed to convert two match points, it was on to a decisive tie-break, which went something like this:
- CM to serve: Moya attempts a forehand winner that he pulls wide. 1-0 Grosjean
- SG: A Moya shot appears out, but is called good. Grosjean plays on and finally wins the point with a clutch backhand topspin lob. A gentleman behind me yells to Grosjean, "That's a double point for you, buddy!" Grosjean turns to the fan, smiles, and nods in agreement. 2-0 Grosjean
- SG: Moya forehand winner. 2-1 Grosjean
- CM: A dynamic Grosjean crosscourt forehand winner. 3-1 Grosjean
- CM: Moya goes down the line with a forehand and forces a Grosjean error. 3-2 Grosjean
- SG: service winner. 4-2 Grosjean
- SG: serve is called out, but overruled correctly, and Grosjean replays the first serve. A let. Another let. Finally a service winner. 5-2 Grosjean
- CM: Moya comes to the net behind a good forehand, but strikes the forehand volley horribly and long. 6-2 Grosjean, match point #3
- CM: Moya shows a good eye to let a Grosjean forehand pass go long. 6-3 Grosjean, match point #4
- SG: Grosjean's first serve is close to being an ace but called out on a very late call. Grosjean looks skyward, then serves again. Moya lamely hits a backhand into the net. Make the final: 6-3, 4-6, 7-6 (7-3) for the undersized Frenchman!
So after both players missed on two match points in "regulation play", Grosjean finally was the more mentally solid in the tie-break. His reward: a third round date with Pete Sampras, who showed some signs of vulnerability today?.
Pete Sampras (3) def. Fabrice Santoro, 6-3, 3-6, 6-0
2nd round
Stadium
Previous head-to-head: Santoro leads 3-2
The mighty Pete Sampras has struggled in this tournament since winning here in 1995, and came into the event with a three match losing streak. Sampras looked solid in his 6-4, 6-4 first round win over David Prinosil. However, this match against the unorthodox French artiste Santoro, who has bedevilled Pete in the past, would figure to provide an indication of Sampras's form this week.
The match started at 10:00 AM, and it must be said that these early start times have been a source of controversy. Gustavo Kuerten, forced to play at this early hour yesterday, complained bitterly about it yesterday, and suggested that if he were Pete Sampras he would not be obliged to perform at such an early hour. So it was rather ironic to see Pete called upon to work the morning shift today. Sampras was hardly thrilled about the scheduling either: "I wasn't that crazy about it," he admitted after t
he match. "I haven't played at 10:00 since 1983, playing junior tennis."
However, Sampras seemed wide awake to start the match. The quality of Pete's backhand ? his weaker side -- is usually a clue as to how sharp he is. The backhand was splendid in the first set, as he cracked several winners off that side and seemed insensible to the feared Santoro trickery.
But the Frenchman did not give up, and in the second set began using his unique two-handed slice forehand as an approach shot, beating Sampras to the net and forcing Sampras to make difficult low passing shots. Sampras talked after the match about the damage that Santoro's wicked slices can do: "That's the most under-spin I think we have on tour. The ball stays low. I had a hard time passing on my backhand. He just kind of chips it, and it gets lower and lower." An impatient Sampras had let the crafty
Santoro get to him ? Pete began mistiming his shots, and for that reason found himself in a third set.
Once Sampras recovered his patience and timing, it was game over for Fabrice, and the American steamrolled through a very impressive 6-0 third set.
There are still some signs of concern for Sampras ? the second-set lull is a worry, and his Achilles heel of last year, the double fault, is still a problem (10 of them today). But our impression is that Sampras looks considerably sharper than he did here last year, when he lost in the quarterfinals to Thomas Enqvist.